Table 1 |
|
|
Comparison of transposable element (TE) histone modification enrichments found in this study with those of previous studies. |
|
|
Enriched in previous studya |
Status in current studyb |
|
|
|
|
Kondo and Issa 2003 (Human) [19] |
|
|
|
|
|
SINE: H3K9me2 |
Depleted |
|
|
|
|
Martens et al. 2005 (Mouse) [20] |
|
|
|
|
|
SINE: H3K9me3 |
Depleted |
|
|
|
|
SINE: H3K27me3 |
Enriched |
|
|
|
|
SINE: H4K20me3 |
Depleted |
|
|
|
|
LTR: H3K9me3 |
Enriched |
|
|
|
|
LTR: H3K27me3 |
Enriched |
|
|
|
|
LTR: H4K20me3 |
Depleted |
|
|
|
|
DNA: H3K27me3 |
Enriched |
|
|
|
|
DNA: H4K20me3 |
Depleted |
|
|
|
|
Mikkelsen et al. 2007 (Mouse) [8] |
|
|
|
|
|
LTR: H3K9me3 |
Enriched |
|
|
|
|
LTR: H4K20me3 |
Depleted |
|
|
|
|
Pauler et al. 2008 (Mouse) [22] |
|
|
|
|
|
SINE: H3K27me3 |
Enriched |
|
|
|
|
a TE classes (SINE, LINE, LTR or DNA) that were shown to be enriched for specific histone modifications (as shown) in previous studies. b Status of the same TE class-histone modification pairs as enriched or depleted in this study |
|
|
Huda et al. Mobile DNA 2010 1:2 doi:10.1186/1759-8753-1-2 |
|
